Today, American social media groups call for the eradication, elimination of
the white race, including Jews, Christians; and they continue to clamor for
abortion rights which results in genocide, for the most part, against African
Americans. We have been convinced we judge people by their skin color
and their ‘looks’ instead of their character. White people control
government, corporate conglomerates and the news media. Basically only
attractive white women are even allowed to report the news mainly because
it is white men doing the hiring for on-camera news reporter and news
anchor desk jobs so something must be done to eliminate ‘whiteness’.
You could say this discussion somewhat began at or around the time of the
World Science Festival in 2016 where bio-ethicists addressed climate
change by proposing the idea of human engineering to save the planet.
Unbeknownst to U.S. taxpayers, we already know that U.S. taxpayer dollars
go toward helping scientists in China study and experiment with viruses
and DNA. Taxpayers should be made aware of exactly what scientific
research and experiments their tax dollars are funding instead of the U.S.
government allowing the secret funding of worldwide scientific research.
We already can manipulate through DNA the sex of child before it is born
as well as eye color, hair color as well as turn all the different skin colors,
white, black, brown and so on, into a universal, pleasing to the eye, non-
white skin color. Well, now we can invasively modify human beings to
reduce their impact on the environment to deal with the existential crisis
we are currently facing with climate change.
By changing the underlying biology in humans we can alter the size of
humans and their diet to create more environmentally-friendly, greener
humans. In 1979, China had a one-child policy to alleviate pressures on
their environment. Eighteen per cent of all greenhouse emissions come
from livestock farming. At the World Science Festival in 2016 a pill was
discussed, that the government would mandate everyone take, which
would make people hate the taste of meat. We can artificially induce
intolerance to meat by stimulating the immune system against common
bovine proteins that would act like a nicotine patch causing an allergic
reaction in humans when they consumed meat. The ‘hate meat’ pill would
make you sick if you consume meat forcibly pushing humans toward a
vegetarian lifestyle.
Furthermore, we can also reduce the size of our physical footprint reducing
our body mass so we consume less of the earth’s resources so there will
be less of us to transport, feed and water. Smaller people tend to live
longer so there would have to be a cut-off age when elimination takes place
based on usefulness to the state under the guise of your contribution to
the planet which can be justified and consensually agreed upon. Human
engineering has already determined that the ‘ideal height’ of a human for
ideal impact on the environment would be ‘50 centimeters’ which is
standing no higher than a chicken in order for the ideal impact on the
planet.
Will our descendants be willing to embrace modifying human biology? It
will not matter because we will turn control over to the state which has
climate emergency powers, as exhibited during the 2020 pandemic, to
restrict freedom of movement, speech, assembly and ownership. As we will
find out, modifying human biology will prove easier than modifying the
climate.
SUPPLEMENTAL SOURCE: WORLD SCIENCE FESTIVAL 2016